Witness Protection Bill tabled
Syed Jaymal Zahiid Dec 16, 08 10:57am
Provisions in the Witness Protection Bill tabled for first reading in Parliament have placed much of the decision-making powers in the hands of the attorney-general (AG) and the relevant minister.
*Under supervision of director-general
*What witnesses have to disclosepicked from Malaysiakini at http://malaysiakini.com/news/94912
have seen many of the witnesses programme failed to comply its integrity in U.S. movie. This made me wonderering in Malaysia, a high corruption battle-in country has her determination in giving the "goldenfinger" real out-of-trouble protection policy, and encouraging more unveiling underground criminal !
{A Registrar of Witness Protection be appointed to handle the "EXTREMELY IMPORTANT" booklet - " Register of Participants "} ? ? - This is so called the booklet which was similar to "Death Note" which will determine the lifespan of the participants; 
So how can this booklet which contain the participants' origin identity and new identity (which inclusive of their birth certificate, I/C, marriage certificate and other relevant documents) to be handled by somebody who "might" be NOT integrity (as perception by most of the people that - a corrupted officer "again" appointed by a corrupted government "again"; and anticipation by people that a clean government to be reformed "soon") !
{In order to protect the witness' identity, this act will penalize those involved officer who leak out information with 20years sentence} .... BUT {clause 24 . also to protect (or immune) the officer from being prosecuted if their action/s is based on purely on their "kindness" (can't find a suitable word for this, for I'm translating directing from Malaysiakini-Mandarin version), reasonable and for all to executing their duty in complying the act}

1 comment:
This is totally not the proper way to protect witnesses. It's sounded indirectly as another threat to informers and chase them out from doorstep !
Wondering this acting to protect witnesses or to protect their crony once again ?
Post a Comment